Watertown runs a basketball clinic at Belmont’s expense

UPDATES:

March 3, 2010 - The debate has been going on for a while at the online edition of the Belmont Citizen-Herald, under the article written after the Belmont – Dracut game.

[Full Disclosure: My son, Luka Ladan, plays for the Belmont Marauders. I've never coached basketball on any level.]

“Winning is like deodorant – it comes up and a lot of things don’t stink.” – Doc Rivers, The Celtics Coach

Not long ago, the Belmont Marauders basketball team was undefeated, 15 and 0. But, they lost two of their last three games, first to Reading, then last night to Watertown. Both these teams are considered serious rivals and getting the wins was extremely important to the team. The game against the Watertown Raiders was particularly important because the team wanted to go into the post season on the wings of a decisive win against a great rival. It all looked possible as Belmont thoroughly outplayed Watertown (watch full game here ) in their first game of the season. This time, the final score was Watertown 57 – Belmont 53.

In my article from January 13th, 2010, titled Big win for Belmont against undefeated Reading, I highlighted what Belmont needed to do differently to get more decisive wins and to prevail in tough situations. When the article came out some people expressed their consternation that I was too pessimistic while the team was winning. I wanted the team not to be oblivious to the “deodorant effect,” to look at their performances objectively, and start fixing problems while there was still time. Read more ->

Phil Jackson’s Books

Phil Jackson is unique in many respects. He won more championships than Red Auerbach (although that record is still open to debate), he was crafty enough, or lucky enough, to have coached some of the greatest superstars and teams in the history of the game. Another thing which makes him unique is his book recommendations to the players. He did it while coaching the Bulls, and he’s doing it while coaching the Lakers. Is this intellectual snobbery, or a very profound way of reaching his players?

We all know that the the only way for players to excel is to be none else but themselves. You’d think that this is a simple formula, but when you watch any basketball game (high school, college, pros) you see players trying to be something they are not. Players make adjustments over the years, they improve their free-throw shooting, or work on their post-up game (to name but a few), but they reach their true potential only when they realize who they really are on the basketball court, which is really an extension of their ordinary life personality. A true transformation happens when a go-to guy realizes that he’s really just a very good second fiddle. He can still drop thirty points on a given night, but forcing the ball through his hands on every possession alienates him from his true nature and minimizes his potential and reach. If somebody likes deferring, or simply enjoys passing (I believe a good pass can give you the same thrill as ripping it through the net from the three-point line) asking him to shoot a lot, even if he has a terrific shot, makes that player uncomfortable in his role, and minimizes the positive impact he could have on the team. Read more ->